Following the Actions of Others: The Simple Average of Strategies in a Rational Expectations Economy
SSRN Electronic Journal
2022
- 1Citations
- 702Usage
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We study an alternative mechanism of social learning in a rational expectations equilibrium economy where agents learn from the actions of others by adopting the simple average of ex ante optimal strategies of their social network. When information is exogenous, large social networks benefit all agents if and only if agents are relatively homogeneous in terms of information precision. In contrast, a setting where both information acquisition and network formation are endogenous leads to small social networks in equilibrium. Both solitary action and large social networks are unstable as agents have an incentive to form, respectively disintegrate into, small social networks of just two or three agents. However, each agent would benefit if larger networks were imposed on the entire economy by a central agent. We further show that imposing large social networks on the economy reduces information acquisition, market efficiency, market liquidity, and trading volume, while increasing return volatility.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know