Why Has CEO Pay Increased So Much?

Citation data:

SSRN Electronic Journal

Publication Year:
2006
Usage 25998
Abstract Views 22737
Downloads 3261
Captures 109
Exports-Saves 86
Readers 23
Mentions 2
Economics Blog Mentions 1
News Mentions 1
Social Media 2
Tweets 2
Citations 231
Citation Indexes 231
Ratings
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN Id:
890829; 901826
DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.890829; 10.2139/ssrn.901826
Author(s):
Gabaix, Xavier ; Landier, Augustin
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Executive compensation; wage distribution; Pareto distribution; wage inequality; assignment; incentives; pay performance sensitivity; human capital; extreme value; theory; superstars; calibratable corporate finance
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
Most Recent Economics Blog Mention
Most Recent News Mention
article description
This paper develops a simple competitive model of CEO pay. A large part of the rise in CEO compensation in the US economy is explained without assuming managerial entrenchment, mishandling of options, or theft. CEOs have observable managerial talent and are matched to assets in a competitive assignment model. The marginal impact of a CEO's talent is assumed to increase with the value of the assets under his control. Under very general assumptions, using results from extreme value theory, the model determines the level of CEO pay across firms and over time, and the pay-sensitivity relations. The model predicts the cross-sectional Cobb-Douglas relation between pay and firm size. It also predicts that the level of CEO compensation should increase one for one with the average market capitalization of large firms in the economy. Therefore, the five-fold increase of CEO pay between 1980 and 2000 can be fully attributed to the increase in market capitalization of large US companies. The model can also be used to study other large changes at the top of the income distribution, and offers a benchmark for calibratable corporate finance.