PlumX Metrics
SSRN
Embed PlumX Metrics

The Unforeseen Ethical Ramifications of Classroom Faculty Participation in Law School Clinics

University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 75, 2007
  • 0
    Citations
  • 2,355
    Usage
  • 1
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Usage
    2,355
    • Abstract Views
      2,130
    • Downloads
      225
  • Captures
    1
    • Readers
      1
      • SSRN
        1
  • Ratings
    • Download Rank
      272,916

Paper Description

The past decade has seen an enormous expansion in both the types of clinical programs offered by law schools and the role of clinical education in the law school curriculum. With this development has come greater involvement on the part of classroom faculty in clinical programs, who are increasingly collaborating with clinic faculty and students in clinic cases in a variety of ways. In this article, Professor Rovner asserts that such collaborations, as desirable as they may be for the practical and pedagogical benefits they offer, also may present significant ethical issues for faculty, students and clients. This article analyzes some of the most common professional responsibility issues that may develop when classroom faculty work with law school clinics, focusing in particular on the areas of unauthorized practice of law, confidentiality and conflicts of interest. In the article, Professor Rovner identifies the multilayered ethical considerations that arise from classroom faculty involvement in clinics, develops a systematic taxonomy that promotes a better understanding of these concerns, and proposes a series of best practices that law schools might adopt to address, and perhaps prevent, ethical violations from arising.

Bibliographic Details

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know