Where Two Are Fighting, the Third Wins: Stronger Selection Facilitates Greater Polymorphism in Traits Conferring Competition-Dispersal Tradeoffs.

Citation data:

PloS one, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 2, Page: e0147970

Publication Year:
Usage 1603
Full Text Views 1143
Abstract Views 443
Views 11
Downloads 5
Link-outs 1
Captures 17
Exports-Saves 11
Readers 6
Repository URL:
10.1371/journal.pone.0147970; 10.1371/journal.pone.0147970.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0147970.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0147970.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0147970.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0147970.g004
PMC4742239; 4742239
Adam Lampert; Tsvi Tlusty; Jung-Woong Kim
Public Library of Science (PLoS); Figshare; PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Agricultural and Biological Sciences; Cell Biology; Genetics; Evolutionary Biology; Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified; Ecology; Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified; Developmental Biology; Infectious Diseases; Numerous species exhibit; pattern; Selection Facilitates Greater Polymorphism; trait; selection increases; 59999 Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified; 69999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified; numerous species exhibit; selection facilitates greater polymorphism; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; SYMPATRIC SPECIATION; EPHEMERAL RESOURCE; EVOLUTION; COOPERATION; DYNAMICS; MODELS; SIZE; BIODIVERSITY; COEXISTENCE
article media
article description
A major conundrum in evolution is that, despite natural selection, polymorphism is still omnipresent in nature: Numerous species exhibit multiple morphs, namely several abundant values of an important trait. Polymorphism is particularly prevalent in asymmetric traits, which are beneficial to their carrier in disruptive competitive interference but at the same time bear disadvantages in other aspects, such as greater mortality or lower fecundity. Here we focus on asymmetric traits in which a better competitor disperses fewer offspring in the absence of competition. We report a general pattern in which polymorphic populations emerge when disruptive selection increases: The stronger the selection, the greater the number of morphs that evolve. This pattern is general and is insensitive to the form of the fitness function. The pattern is somewhat counterintuitive since directional selection is excepted to sharpen the trait distribution and thereby reduce its diversity (but note that similar patterns were suggested in studies that demonstrated increased biodiversity as local selection increases in ecological communities). We explain the underlying mechanism in which stronger selection drives the population towards more competitive values of the trait, which in turn reduces the population density, thereby enabling lesser competitors to stably persist with reduced need to directly compete. Thus, we believe that the pattern is more general and may apply to asymmetric traits more broadly. This robust pattern suggests a comparative, unified explanation to a variety of polymorphic traits in nature.