nIFTy cosmology: the clustering consistency of galaxy formation models

Citation data:

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, ISSN: 0035-8711, Vol: 469, Issue: 1, Page: 749-762

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 12
Downloads 12
Captures 18
Readers 18
Citations 9
Citation Indexes 9
Repository URL:
https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/ff825015-2a1b-487e-86a0-f8ea584b8fe6; http://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/record(ff825015-2a1b-487e-86a0-f8ea584b8fe6).html; http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/445581
DOI:
10.1093/mnras/stx913
Author(s):
Pujol, Arnau; Skibba, Ramin A.; Gaztanaga, Enrique; Benson, Andrew; Blaizot, Jeremy; Bower, Richard; Carretero, Jorge; Castander, Francisco J.; Cattaneo, Andrea; Cora, Sofia A.; Croton, Darren J.; Cui, Weiguang; Cunnama, Daniel; De Lucia, Gabriella; Devriendt, Julien E.; Elahi, Pascal J.; Font, Andreea; Fontanot, Fabio; Garcia-Bellido, Juan; Gargiulo, Ignacio D.; Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta; Helly, John; Henriques, Bruno M. B.; Hirschmann, Michaela; Knebe, Alexander; Lee, Jaehyun; Mamon, Gary A.; Monaco, Pierluigi; Onions, Julian; Padilla, Nelson D.; Pearce, Frazer R.; Power, Chris; Somerville, Rachel S.; Srisawat, Chaichalit; Thomas, Peter A.; Tollet, Edouard; Vega-Martinez, Cristian A.; Yi, Sukyoung K. Show More Hide
Publisher(s):
Oxford University Press (OUP); Oxford University Press
Tags:
methods: numerical; galaxies: haloes; cosmology: theory; DARK-MATTER HALOES; CHALLENGE LIGHTCONE SIMULATION; ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI; LUMINOSITY FUNCTION; SEMIANALYTIC MODEL; ANALYTIC MODEL; MASS FUNCTION; OCCUPATION DISTRIBUTION; BULGE FORMATION; LOCAL UNIVERSE; Physics and Astronomy; Earth and Planetary Sciences
article description
We present a clustering comparison of 12 galaxy formation models [including semi-analytic models (SAMs) and halo occupation distribution (HOD) models] all run on halo catalogues and merger trees extracted from a single Lambda cold dark matter N-body simulation. We compare the results of the measurements of the mean halo occupation numbers, the radial distribution of galaxies in haloes and the two-point correlation functions (2PCF). We also study the implications of the different treatments of orphan (galaxies not assigned to any dark matter subhalo) and non-orphan galaxies in these measurements. Our main result is that the galaxy formation models generally agree in their clustering predictions but they disagree significantly between HOD and SAMs for the orphan satellites. Although there is a very good agreement between the models on the 2PCF of central galaxies, the scatter between the models when orphan satellites are included can be larger than a factor of 2 for scales smaller than 1 h(-1) Mpc. We also show that galaxy formation models that do not include orphan satellite galaxies have a significantly lower 2PCF on small scales, consistent with previous studies. Finally, we show that the 2PCF of orphan satellites is remarkably different between SAMs and HOD models. Orphan satellites in SAMs present a higher clustering than in HOD models because they tend to occupy more massive haloes. We conclude that orphan satellites have an important role on galaxy clustering and they are the main cause of the differences in the clustering between HOD models and SAMs.