Gut permeability to lactulose and mannitol differs in treated Crohn's disease and celiac disease patients and healthy subjects
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, ISSN: 1414-431X, Vol: 41, Issue: 12, Page: 1105-1109
2008
- 47Citations
- 22,838Usage
- 93Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations47
- Citation Indexes47
- 47
- CrossRef22
- Scielo5
- Usage22,838
- Full Text Views22,137
- 22,137
- Abstract Views701
- 701
- Captures93
- Readers93
- 93
Article Description
The gut barrier monitors and protects the gastrointestinal tract from challenges such as microorganisms, toxins and proteins that could act as antigens. There is evidence that gut barrier dysfunction may act as a primary disease mechanism in intestinal disorders. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the barrier function towards sugars after the appropriate treatment of celiac disease and Crohn's disease patients and compare the results with those obtained with healthy subjects. Fifteen healthy volunteers, 22 celiac disease patients after 1 year of a gluten-free diet, and 31 Crohn's disease patients in remission were submitted to an intestinal permeability test with 6.0 g lactulose and 3.0 g mannitol. Six-hour urinary lactulose excretion in Crohn's disease patients was significantly higher than in both celiac disease patients (0.42 vs 0.15%) and healthy controls (0.42 vs 0.07%). Urinary lactulose excretion was significantly higher in celiac disease patients than in healthy controls (0.15 vs 0.07%). Urinary mannitol excretion in Crohn's disease patients was the same as healthy controls (21 vs 21%) and these values were significantly higher than in celiac disease patients (10.9%). The lactulose/mannitol ratio was significantly higher in Crohn's disease patients in comparison to celiac disease patients (0.021 vs 0.013) and healthy controls (0.021 vs 0.003) and this ratio was also significantly higher in celiac disease patients compared to healthy controls (0.013 vs 0.003). In spite of treatment, differences in sugar permeability were observed in both disease groups. These differences in the behavior of the sugar probes probably reflect different mechanisms for the alterations of intestinal permeability.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=62749111325&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879x2008001200010; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19148373; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2008001200010&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/bjmbr/v41n12/7265.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-879X2008001200010&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2008001200010; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-879X2008001200010; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879x2008001200010; https://www.scielo.br/j/bjmbr/a/VJQBpGpQmtK8mCgfGjpgWjg/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know