Depression, Cognitive Determinants, and Social Influence in Explaining Betel Nut Chewing among College Students in Southern Taiwan
中華心理衛生學刊, ISSN: 1023-7283, Page: 587-612
2010
- 2Citations
- 5,213Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Academic Citation Index (ACI) - airiti2
- Usage5,213
- Abstract Views4,540
- 4,540
- Downloads673
Article Description
研究目的:過去文獻已證實ASE模式(Attitude-Social Influence-Efficacy model)可解釋國人檳榔使用的行為,指出檳榔使用結果預期透過自我效能影響嚼檳榔的意圖與行為,社會影響則直接影響意圖與行為。本研究擬修正ASE模式,假設憂鬱可以直接影響嚼檳榔的行為,或透過認知因素間接影響檳榔的使用。研究方法:由南區大學生依分層叢集抽樣出3246名有效樣本,施測檳榔使用意圖與行為量表、檳榔結果預期量表、社會影響量表、拒用檳榔自我效能量表及柯氏憂鬱量表;資料以結構性方程式驗證心理社會因子之模式適配度。研究結果:指出檳榔使用之高正向結果預期需透過低拒用自我效能影響嚼檳榔的意圖與行為;高度社會影響與低拒用自我效能直接影響檳榔使用行為;而憂鬱則透過高正向結果預期和低拒用自我效能,預測嚼檳榔之意圖與行為。研究結論:本研究建議可透過教育與諮商輔導增加大學生學習情緒調控知能,減少檳榔的正向結果預期以及強化拒用自我效能,以預防檳榔的使用。
Bibliographic Details
https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/10237283-201012-201103230008-201103230008-587-612; http://dx.doi.org/10.30074/fjmh.201012_23(4).0004; http://dx.doi.org/10.30074/fjmh.201012_23%284%29.0004; https://dx.doi.org/10.30074/fjmh.201012_23%284%29.0004; https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=10237283-201012-201103230008-201103230008-587-612
社團法人中華心理衛生協會
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know