Diplomaism or Need for Educational Opportunity? -The Social Meaning of Competition for School Admission
教育心理學報, ISSN: 1011-5714, Page: 167-182
2003
- 20Citations
- 6,950Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- Academic Citation Index (ACI) - airiti20
- Usage6,950
- Abstract Views5,988
- 5,988
- Downloads962
Article Description
本研究透過社會大眾對於升學機會的推估與期待,對照實際客觀升學機會,探討社會大眾整體的主觀升學需求以及對升學壓力的歸因傾向。研究調查20歲以上之台灣地區民眾2052位,其中有在學子女者808位,樣本為分層隨機取樣。研究發現,就民眾的教育需求而言,現有的升學機會顯然是供不應求的。民眾傾向高估實際的升學機會而且對升學機會的期待又遠高於現有的升學機會,因而現有的升學機會只能滿足半數家長對子女的教育期待。此外,值得探究的是,受訪者的教育程度在升學期待、需求與歸因中所扮演的角色。分析結果顯示,高學歷者所期待的升學機會低於低學歷者,對子女的教育期待則高於低學歷者,傾向將升學壓力歸因於「升學主義」。
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know