Influence of Typical Subgrade Structures on Aerodynamic Characteristics of High Speed Trains in Cross wind Conditions
Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, ISSN: 0577-6686, Vol: 54, Issue: 4, Page: 186-195
2018
- 7Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
Due to geographical and environmental constraints, high-speed railways use a variety of roadbed structures such as flat ground, different height embankments, viaducts, etc. When trains run on embankments and viaducts, the flow around the car body is more complex than the flat ground. Under the action of crosswind, there are obvious differences in the cross-wind aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed trains on different subgrade structures. The unreasonable subgrade structure will affect the cross-wind safety of the train. At the same time, the structure of the train is complex, the bogie and pantograph have an important role on the flow field characteristics of the train, and the over simplified profile of the short train cannot accurately reflect the true aerodynamic characteristics of the train. In the present paper, in order to study the influence of typical roadbed structure on the aerodynamic characteristics of high speed trains, a real high-speed train with 9 carriages at the speed of 200 km/h was taken for case study, and the details of windshields, bogies and pantographs were taken into consideration. The cross wind velocities were chosen as 20, 30, 35 and 40 m/s. The aerodynamics performance of the high-speed train under the four conditions of plane ground, 3m-embankment, 6m-embankment and viaduct were simulated and compared, and the differences and regularities in the aerodynamic characteristics under cross wind conditions on different subgrade were analyzed. The results provide a reference for train safety control on complex subgrade structures under cross wind condition.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051266552&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3901/jme.2018.04.186; http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/Jwk_jxgcxb/CN/10.3901/JME.2018.04.186; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=6220611&internal_id=6220611&from=elsevier; https://dx.doi.org/10.3901/jme.2018.04.186
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know