Surgery to Prevent Aspiration
Archives of Otolaryngology, ISSN: 1538-361X, Vol: 101, Issue: 11, Page: 679-682
1975
- 122Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations122
- Citation Indexes122
- CrossRef122
- 121
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
• A glottic closure procedure rather than laryngectomy is suggested for patients with loss of laryngeal sphincter function. The operation allows restoration of respiration and swallowing without aspiration, but sacrifices phonatory function. No patient has had sufficient recovery of laryngeal sphincteric function to warrant an attempt to reverse the laryngeal closure operation. (Arch Otolaryngol 101:679-682, 1975). © 1975, American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0016714233&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1975.00780400037010; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1200909; http://archotol.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=605984; https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/article-abstract/605984
American Medical Association (AMA)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know