Auditory Verbal Hallucinations: Prevalence, Phenomenology, and the Dissociation Hypothesis
Psychosis, Trauma and Dissociation: Evolving Perspectives on Severe Psychopathology, Second Edition, Page: 207-222
2019
- 3Citations
- 14Usage
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef3
- Usage14
- Abstract Views14
- Captures4
- Readers4
Book Chapter Description
Hearing voices that other people do not hear has long been considered a cardinal sign of madness. This chapter reviews the research supporting the argument that voice hearing is a dissociative phenomenon. It begins with a brief review of population studies, followed by studies of voice hearing in various clinical and nonclinical groups. The chapter reviews the research linking dissociation to voice hearing, with particular emphasis on a series of important studies from Perona-Garcelán and his group. It discusses the increasing emphasis on the relevance of a person's relationship to his or her voices, as opposed to any attempt to get rid of them, as the major focus of treatment. The high prevalence of voice hearing in those with trauma and dissociative disorders indicates the importance of dissociation in voice hearing. Dissociation emerges as a powerful explanatory tool for understanding the development and maintenance of auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=86000076124&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118585948.ch13; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118585948.ch13; https://touroscholar.touro.edu/faculty_pubs/379; https://touroscholar.touro.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1378&context=faculty_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118585948.ch13
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know