Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair
British Journal of Surgery, ISSN: 0007-1323, Vol: 97, Issue: 4, Page: 600-608
2010
- 190Citations
- 128Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations190
- Citation Indexes183
- 183
- CrossRef133
- Policy Citations5
- Policy Citation5
- Clinical Citations2
- PubMed Guidelines2
- Captures128
- Readers128
- 128
- Mentions3
- References2
- Wikipedia2
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Outcome of open inguinal hernia repair using sutureless self-gripping mesh – a retrospective single cohort study
Neurological disturbances after open inguinal hernia repair affect approximately one in ten patients. Sutureless, self-gripping meshes were developed with the aim of reducing postoperative neurological
Article Description
Background: Chronic postoperative pain is a major drawback of inguinal hernia repair. This study compared the frequency of chronic pain after laparoscopic (totally extraperitoneal patch, TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) repairs. Methods: A randomized multicentre study with 5 years' follow-up was conducted on men with a primary inguinal hernia. Chronic pain was categorized as mild, moderate or severe by blinded observers. A subgroup analysis was performed on 121 patients who experienced moderate or severe pain at any time during follow-up. Results: Overall, 1370 of 1512 randomized patients underwent surgery, 665 in the TEP and 705 in the Lichtenstein group. The total incidence of chronic pain was 11-0 versus 21-7 per cent at 1 year, 11-0 versus 24-8 per cent at 2 years, 9-9 versus 20-2 per cent at 3 years and 9-4 versus 18-8 per cent at 5 years in the TEP and Lichtenstein groups respectively (P < 0-001). After 5 years, 1-9 per cent of patients in the TEP and 3-5 per cent in the Lichtenstein group reported moderate or severe pain (P m 0-092). Of the 121 patients, 72 (59-5 per cent) no longer reported pain a median of 9-4 (range 6-7-10-8) years after operation. Conclusion: Five years after surgery only a small proportion of patients still report moderate to severe chronic pain. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair leads to less chronic pain than open repair. Registration number: NCT00568269 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77949373264&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6904; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20186889; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00568269; https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article/97/4/600/6150225; https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6904; https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article-abstract/97/4/600/6150225?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know