Determination of coenzyme Q10 in human seminal plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography and its clinical application
Biomedical Chromatography, ISSN: 1099-0801, Vol: 20, Issue: 10, Page: 1082-1086
2006
- 19Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef14
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Article Description
A high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for the analysis of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) in human seminal plasma was developed and applied to investigate its clinical significance as a reference index relating to oxidative stress and infertile status of spermatozoa. After precipitation of proteins in seminal plasma with methanol, CoQ10 and coenzyme Q9 (CoQ9; internal standard) were extracted with hexane. The supernatant after centrifugation was evaporated to dryness with nitrogen at 45°C. The residue was re-dissolved in isopropanol. HPLC separation of the sample solution was performed on a Lichrospher C, column with a mobile phase composed of isopropanol-methanol-tetrahydrofuran in the ratio of 55:39:6 (v/v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Under the chromatographic conditions described, the CoQ10 and CoQ9 had retention times of approximately 5.83 and 4.97 min, respectively. The peaks were detected at UV 275 nm. Good separation and detectability of CoQ10 in human seminal plasma were obtained. The method was linear in the range 0.01-10.00 μg/mL. The relative standard deviations within- and between-assay for CoQ10 analysis were 0.85 and 1.86%, respectively. The average recoveries were 94.1-99.0% for the human seminal plasma samples. The CoQ10 levels in seminal plasma of 195 patients and 23 control subjects were studied. CoQ10 concentrations in the two populations were: 37.1 ± 12.2 ng /mL in the fertile group, and 48.5 ± 20.4 ng/mL in the infertile group. The large difference (p < 0.01) between the fertile and infertile populations is evident. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33750697618&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmc.645; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16583456; https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bmc.645; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/bmc.645; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bmc.645
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know