Prognostic significance of the lymphocyte-to-neutrophil ratio in percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma
Cancer, ISSN: 0008-543X, Vol: 104, Issue: 6, Page: 1271-1280
2005
- 19Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef16
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
BACKGROUND. The prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in surgically resected carcinomas was reported. To apply this to inoperable non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC) of Stage IIIB-IV, the authors estimated the occurrence of TILs using percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens, and tested the validity of this method. METHODS. The authors defined the L-N index as [L/(L + N) - L /(L + N)], in which L and N denoted lymphocyte and neutrophil counts in the aspiration smear, and L and N denoted lymphocyte and neutrophil counts in the peripheral blood specimen. The cutoff value was set at twice the standard deviation of the L-N index of 41 smears contaminated with abundant blood. Retrospectively, the authors compared the survival rate of the group with a high L-N index (lymphocyte-dominant group) (n = 12) with the survival rate of the group with a low L-N index (lymphocyte-nondominant group) (n = 60). Then, they performed a prospective study and compared the survival rates of these 2 groups (n = 21 and n = 54). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the effect of the L-N index as a continuous variable and other prognostic factors. The correlation (r) between the L-N index-based grouping (L-N grouping) and the histologie grade of TILs was studied among resected lung tumor specimens (n = 164). RESULTS. In the retrospective and prospective studies, the survival rate was significantly higher in the lymphocyte-dominant group than in the lymphocyte-nondominant group (P = 0.0019 and P = 0.0001). Using multivariate analysis, the L-N index was an independent prognostic factor. A significant correlation was noted between L-N grouping and histologic grade of TILs (r = 0.476). CONCLUSIONS. The L-N index of aspiration smears was found to be an independent prognostic factor for patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. L-N grouping was correlated with the histologic assessment of TILs. © 2005 American Cancer Society.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know