Bias between capnometry and venous carbon dioxide during initial assessment of pediatric emergency department patients: A video‐based study
JACEP Open, ISSN: 2688-1152, Vol: 5, Issue: 3, Page: e13170
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
The bias of capnometry (ETCO 2 ) and venous carbon dioxide (vpCO 2 ) among pediatric emergency department (PED) patients triaged to critical care areas is unknown. We aimed to explore correlations and bias between ETCO 2 and vpCO 2 ¸and identify predictors of bias. This was an observational, video‐based, retrospective study comparing ETCO 2 and vpCO 2. Pediatric patients with simultaneous ETCO 2 and vpCO 2 data were included. Our primary aim utilized linear regressions to determine correlations and Bland–Altman analysis to assess bias. Our secondary aim utilized multiple regression to identify clinical covariates contributing to bias. Covariates included age, respiratory rate, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, capnometry interface, PED diagnosis, and PED disposition. A total of 200 PED patients with ETCO 2 and vpCO 2 data were included. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) ETCO 2, vpCO 2, and ΔCO 2 in mmHg were 38 (32, 46), 49 (41, 61), and 11 (4, 20), respectively. ETCO 2 ( r = 0.76) and ΔCO 2 ( r = 0.71) were highly correlated with vpCO 2. The mean bias between ETCO 2 and vpCO 2 was −14.1 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], −41.9 −13.7). The bias between ETCO 2 and vpCO 2 increased at higher values of each measure. ETCO 2 sampling interface was the only independent predictor of vpCO 2 in our multivariate analysis. Patients requiring bag‐valve mask (BVM) ventilation had the highest median bias between ETCO 2 and vpCO 2 (29 mmHg, IQR 15, 37). ETCO 2 and vpCO 2 were highly correlated. However, bias increased at higher levels of both ETCO 2 and vpCO 2. Among PED patients, ETCO 2 ’s ability to approximate vpCO 2 diminishes with worsening hypercarbic respiratory failure.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2688115224012335; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.13170; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85191487541&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38680203; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2688115224012335
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know