Epidural anesthesia dysfunction is associated with postoperative complications after pancreatectomy
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, ISSN: 1868-6982, Vol: 23, Issue: 2, Page: 102-109
2016
- 23Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- CrossRef23
- 20
- Captures36
- Readers36
- 36
Article Description
Background Epidural anesthesia is an accepted measure of pain control after major abdominal surgery. However, if the epidural anesthesia is unsuccessful, a variety of adverse effects can occur - excessive stress response, poor patient mobilization, increased opioid use, and hypotension due to vasodilation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of epidural dysfunction on outcomes after pan-createctomy. Methods Between August 2010 and October 2014, 72 patients underwent open pancreatectomy with epidural anesthesia. Epidural dysfunction was defined as either hypo-function due to inadequate pain control (requirement of epidural replacement, conversion to intravenous continuous opioid infusion, or intravenous bolus opioid use) or hyper-function (hypotension or oliguria). We then analyzed for an association between epidural dysfunction and surgical outcomes. Results Epidural dysfunction occurred in 49% after pancreatectomy - hypo-function in 35% and hyper-function in 14%. Epidural dysfunction was independently associated with the development of overall (P < 0.001), pancreas-related (P = 0.041), and non-pancreas-related complications (P = 0.001). Hypo-function alone was independently associated with both pancreas-related (P = 0.015) and non-pancreas-related complications (P = 0.004). Hyper-function was independently associated with non-pancreas-related complications (P = 0.002). Conclusions Outcomes after pancreatic resection can be improved by increasing the success rate of epidural anesthesia. Highlight With the aim to assess the impact of epidural anesthesia dysfunction on outcomes after pancreatectomy, Sugimoto and colleagues revealed an independent association between hypo-function and both pancreas-related and non-pancreas-related complications, and between hyper-function and non-pancreas-related complications. Increasing the success rate of epidural anesthesia is key to improve outcomes after pancreatectomy.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know