Reproducibility measurements of three methods for calculating in vivo MR-based knee kinematics
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ISSN: 1522-2586, Vol: 42, Issue: 2, Page: 533-538
2015
- 13Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- CrossRef12
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
Purpose To describe three quantification methods for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based knee kinematic evaluation and to report on the reproducibility of these algorithms. Materials and Methods T-weighted, fast-spin echo images were obtained of the bilateral knees in six healthy volunteers. Scans were repeated for each knee after repositioning to evaluate protocol reproducibility. Semiautomatic segmentation defined regions of interest for the tibia and femur. The posterior femoral condyles and diaphyseal axes were defined using the previously defined tibia and femur. All segmentation was performed twice to evaluate segmentation reliability. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation (ITR) were calculated using three methods: a tibial-based registration system, a combined tibiofemoral-based registration method with all manual segmentation, and a combined tibiofemoral-based registration method with automatic definition of condyles and axes. Intraclass correlation coefficients and standard deviations across multiple measures were determined. Results Reproducibility of segmentation was excellent (ATT-=-0.98; ITR-=-0.99) for both combined methods. ATT and ITR measurements were also reproducible across multiple scans in the combined registration measurements with manual (ATT-=-0.94; ITR-=-0.94) or automatic (ATT-=-0.95; ITR-=-0.94) condyles and axes. Conclusion The combined tibiofemoral registration with automatic definition of the posterior femoral condyle and diaphyseal axes allows for improved knee kinematics quantification with excellent in vivo reproducibility.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84937641902&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24790; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25545617; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.24790; https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24790; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jmri.24790; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jmri.24790; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jmri.24790; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.24790/abstract?systemMessage=Wiley+Online+Library+will+have+intermittent+access+on+8th+August+2015+from+10%3A00-16%3A00+BST+%2F+05%3A00-11%3A00+EDT+%2F+17%3A00-23%3A00+SGT+for+essential+maintenance.++Apologies+for+the+inconvenience.; http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/25545617; http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4485602; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jmri.24790; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.24790/abstract
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know