Evaluation of the Impact of Surfactant Digestion on the Bioavailability of Danazol after Oral Administration of Lipidic Self-Emulsifying Formulations to Dogs
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ISSN: 0022-3549, Vol: 97, Issue: 2, Page: 995-1012
2008
- 168Citations
- 84Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations168
- Citation Indexes168
- 168
- CrossRef125
- Captures84
- Readers84
- 84
Article Description
Lipid-based formulations of danazol with varying quantities of included surfactant have been examined in vitro and in vivo. Formulations comprising fatty acid ester surfactants were readily hydrolysed during in vitro digestion, although Cremophor RH40 (CrRH) was less effectively hydrolysed than Cremophor EL (CrEL). Formulations comprising high quantities of digestible surfactant also appeared to less effectively prevent danazol precipitation during in vitro evaluation. These trends were replicated in vivo where danazol bioavailability in beagle dogs was higher after oral administration of self-emulsifying formulations employing 55% (w/w) CrRH when compared with CrEL. The oral bioavailability of danazol after administration of drug formulated in surfactant alone, however, was poor. Studies using predispersed and encapsulated formulations of CrRH subsequently suggested that the low bioavailability of the single surfactant formulations reflected poor dispersion. Mixtures of surfactants, improved dispersion and good oral bioavailability of danazol was evident after administration of formulations comprising CrRH and either Pluronic L121 or Gelucire 44-14, in spite of evidence of danazol precipitation during in vitro digestion of the Gelucire formulation. These data suggest that effective dispersion and resistance to precipitation during both dispersion and digestion are key design parameters for lipid-based formulations comprising high proportions of surfactant. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 97:995–1012, 2008
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002235491632490X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.21246; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=39149091886&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18064698; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002235491632490X
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know