Pharmacokinetic‐tailored approach to hemophilia prophylaxis: Medical decision making and outcomes
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, ISSN: 2475-0379, Vol: 4, Issue: 2, Page: 326-333
2020
- 14Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- CrossRef11
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
Article Description
Clinical application of population pharmacokinetics (popPK) is of increasing interest to patients with hemophilia, providers, and payers. Routine use of popPK profiles in factor replacement prophylaxis decision making has the potential to maintain or improve efficacy and reduce product consumption. To investigate the feasibility of implementation and longitudinal assessment of pharmacokinetic (PK)‐tailored prophylaxis in routine clinical practice for hemophilia A and to describe factors that influence decision making for prescribed hemophilia prophylaxis. This longitudinal, multicenter, prospective feasibility study of children and adults with hemophilia A without inhibitors used the Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service—Hemophilia (WAPPS‐Hemo) to generate PK profiles. Assessments over 12 weeks captured data on prescribed prophylaxis, popPK tool use, provider decision making, and patient‐reported outcomes. Eighteen participants aged 6 to 39 years enrolled; half used extended half‐life concentrates. Patient interest in their PK centered on general curiosity followed by a desire for participation in physical activity and decrease in infusion frequency. Providers used the WAPPS clinical calculator feature to simulate prophylaxis regimens under different dose, infusion, and trough conditions. Most targeted troughs were 1 to 3 IU/dL. The feasibility assessment demonstrated challenges with patient recruitment; however, the majority of participants successfully completed study assessments meeting feasibility targets. A larger‐scale study powered to evaluate the impact of PK‐tailored prophylaxis on clinical and patient‐reported outcomes is feasible with study design modifications to support increased recruitment rate. Shared decision making incorporating patient and provider goals is important and facilitated by regimen simulations with the clinical calculator.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S247503792201980X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12305; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85084231387&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110764; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S247503792201980X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12305
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know