Specifying composites in structural equation modeling: A refinement of the Henseler–Ogasawara specification
Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, ISSN: 1932-1872, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 348-357
2023
- 13Citations
- 36Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Structural equation modeling (SEM) plays an important role in business and social science and so do composites, that is, linear combinations of variables. However, existing approaches to integrate composites into structural equation models still have limitations. A major leap forward has been the Henseler–Ogasawara (H–O) specification, which for the first time allows for seamlessly integrating composites into structural equation models. In doing so, it relies on emergent variables, that is, the composite of interest, and one or more orthogonal excrescent variables, that is, composites that have no surplus meaning but just span the remaining space of the emergent variable's components. Although the H–O specification enables researchers to flexibly model composites in SEM, it comes along with several practical problems: (i) The H–O specification is difficult to visualize graphically; (ii) its complexity could create difficulties for analysts, and (iii) at times SEM software packages seem to encounter convergence issues with it. In this paper, we present a refinement of the original H–O specification that addresses these three problems. In this new specification, only two components load on each excrescent variable, whereas the excrescent variables are allowed to covary among themselves. This results in a simpler graphical visualization. Additionally, researchers facing convergence issues of the original H–O specification are provided with an alternative specification. Finally, we illustrate the new specification's application by means of an empirical example and provide guidance on how (standardized) weights including their standard errors can be calculated in the R package lavaan. The corresponding Mplus model syntax is provided in the Supplementary Material.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know