Failure of Myf5 to Support Myogenic Differentiation without Myogenin, MyoD, and MRF4
Developmental Biology, ISSN: 0012-1606, Vol: 219, Issue: 2, Page: 287-298
2000
- 103Citations
- 96Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations103
- Citation Indexes103
- 103
- CrossRef85
- Captures96
- Readers96
- 96
Article Description
The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors—MyoD, Myf5, myogenin, and MRF4—can each activate the skeletal muscle-differentiation program in transfection assays. However, their functions during embryogenesis, as revealed by gene-knockout studies in mice, are distinct. MyoD and Myf5 have redundant functions in myoblast specification, whereas myogenin and either MyoD or MRF4 are required for differentiation. Paradoxically, myoblasts from myogenin mutant or MyoD/MRF4 double-mutant neonates differentiate normally in vitro, despite their inability to differentiate in vivo, suggesting that the functions of the myogenic bHLH factors are influenced by the cellular environment and that the specific myogenic defects observed in mutant mice do not necessarily reflect essential functions of these factors. Understanding the individual roles of these factors is further complicated by their ability to cross-regulate one another's expression. To investigate the functions of Myf5 in the absence of contributions from other myogenic bHLH factors, we generated triple-mutant mice lacking myogenin, MyoD, and MRF4. These mice appear to contain a normal number of myoblasts, but in contrast to myogenin or MyoD/MRF4 mutants, differentiated muscle fibers fail to form in vivo and myoblasts from neonates of this triple-mutant genotype are unable to differentiate in vitro. These results suggest that physiological levels of Myf5 are insufficient to activate the myogenic program in the absence of other myogenic factors and suggest that specialized functions have evolved for the myogenic bHLH factors to switch on the complete program of muscle gene expression.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012160600996210; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2000.9621; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0034643095&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10694423; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0012160600996210; https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2000.9621
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know