The structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 3.0 Å resolution based on electron crystallography: implication of the charge distribution 1 1Edited by R. Huber
Journal of Molecular Biology, ISSN: 0022-2836, Vol: 286, Issue: 3, Page: 861-882
1999
- 241Citations
- 95Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations241
- Citation Indexes241
- 241
- CrossRef196
- Captures95
- Readers95
- 95
Article Description
Electron crystallography has the potential to visualise the charge status of atoms. This is due to the significantly different scattering factors of neutral and ionised atoms for electrons in the low-resolution range (typically less than 5 Å). In previous work, we observed two different types of densities around acidic residues in the experimental (| F o |) map of bacteriorhodopsin (bR), a light-driven proton pump. We suggested that these might reflect different states of the acidic residues; namely, the protonated (neutral) and the deprotonated (negatively charged) state. To evaluate the observed charge more quantitatively, we refined the atomic model for bR and eight surrounding lipids using our electron crystallographic data set between 8.0 and 3.0 Å resolution, where the charge effect is small. The refined model yielded an R -factor of 23.7 % and a free R -factor of 33.0 %.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283698925293; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1998.2529; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0033605231&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10024456; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022283698925293; https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1998.2529
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know