NMR as a unique tool in assessment and complex determination of weak protein-protein interactions
Topics in Current Chemistry, ISSN: 0340-1022, Vol: 326, Page: 35-46
2012
- 50Citations
- 63Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations50
- Citation Indexes50
- 50
- CrossRef41
- Captures63
- Readers63
- 63
- Mentions2
- References2
- Wikipedia2
Review Description
Protein-protein interactions are crucial for a wide variety of biological processes. These interactions range from high affinity (K mM). While much is known about the nature of high affinity protein complexes, our knowledge about structural characteristics of weak protein-protein interactions (wPPIs) remains limited: in addition to the technical difficulties associated with their investigation, historically wPPIs used to be considered physiologically irrelevant. However, emerging evidence suggests that wPPIs, either in the form of intact protein complexes or as part of large molecular machineries, are fundamentally important for promoting rapid on/off switches of signal transduction, reversible cell-cell contacts, transient assembly/disassembly of signaling complexes, and enzyme-substrate recognition. Therefore an atomic-level elucidation of wPPIs is vital to understanding a cornucopia of diverse cellular events. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is famous for its unique abilities to study wPPIs and, by utilization of the new technical developments combined with sparse data based computational analysis, it now allows rapid identification and structural characterization of wPPIs. Here we present our perspective on the NMR methods employed. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84859920253&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/128_2011_216; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21809187; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/128_2011_216; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/128_2011_216; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/128_2011_216; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/128_2011_216; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/128_2011_216
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know