Chitosan–Stem Cell Interactions
Advances in Polymer Science, ISSN: 1436-5030, Vol: 287, Page: 343-359
2021
- 2Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Chitosan, the deacetylated form of chitin, has been extensively used for tissue engineering in the form of hydrogel, scaffolds, microparticles, nanoparticles, and nanofibers. To develop composite constructs with targeted tissue regeneration, chitosan is often combined with hydroxyapatite, collagen, gelatin, hyaluronic acid, silk fibroin, etc. biomaterials. In addition to this, chitosan is often modified with varied physico-chemical properties. For regenerative application, to improve the efficacy of constructs, chitosan in various forms is combined with various stem cells, among which mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been studied widely. In this review we focused on the studies that exclusively used chitosan in combination with multipotent adipose and bone marrow-derived MSCs and pluripotent-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). When cultured on chitosan, stem cells displayed greater affinity in terms of cellular adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation into functional cell types both in vitro albeit different potential. When transplanted in vivo, stem cell-laden chitosan constructs showed greater integrity into the host system, differentiated into targeted cells, and demonstrated improved repair of the damaged tissue. These studies provide great insight into the current and future potential of chitosan for regenerative applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116464161&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/12_2021_83; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/12_2021_83; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/12_2021_83; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/12_2021_83; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/12_2021_83
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know