Conventional Radiography and Computed Tomography
Medical Radiology, ISSN: 2197-4187, Vol: Part F2937, Page: 55-84
2024
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Book Chapter Description
Conventional radiography is the basic imaging modality for the diagnosis of primary bone tumors of the spine, readily available, often the first examination performed in patients presenting with spinal symptoms such as back pain, mass, or scoliosis. The major limitation is lesion identification in complex anatomy and superimposition. Weight-bearing radiographs are key to assessing the alignment of the spine as this information is not provided by other imaging modalities. It may help the surgeon in making a decision regarding overall spinal balance and need for stabilization. Multidetector CT allows precise anatomical delineation and evaluation of the lesions in complex anatomical locations, where radiographs are not sufficient. Visualization of minor bony changes, tumor mineralization, small calcifications, cortical changes, and periosteal reactions is best possible on CT scan. The lack of characterization of soft tissue along with the lack of precise extent of medullary involvement, which is important for staging, is a major limitation of CT for precise delineation of the lesion extent. MRI can overcome this problem. CT plays an important role in performing imaging-guided biopsy. All three imaging modalities have complementary value with specific advantages for each modality and are often performed together in each individual patient with spinal tumor.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know