Determining similarity of conformational polymorphs
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 2461, Page: 436-448
2002
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Conformational polymorphs are identical molecules that crystallize in different spatial formations. Understanding the amount of difference between the polymorphs might aid drug design as there is a widespread assumption that there exists a direct connection between the conformations in the crystallized form of the molecule and the conformations in the solvent. We define a measure of similarity between conformational polymorphs and present an algorithm to compute it. For this end we weave together in a novel way our graph isomorphism method and substructure matching. We tested our algorithm on conformational polymorphs from the Cambridge Structural Database. Our experiments show that our method is very efficient in practice and has already yielded an important insight on the polymorphs stored in the data base.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84938153818&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45749-6_40; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/3-540-45749-6_40; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/3-540-45749-6_40; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45749-6_40; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-45749-6_40
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know