Applying the principles of population biology: assessment and recommendations
Applied population biology, Page: 263-286
1992
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
Book Chapter Description
The solutions to practical problems have not involved the ready application of a set of firm principles of population biology. This paper explores several possible reasons why this is so, evaluates several weaknesses in the ways in which theoretical principles are currently developed, and suggests several modifications of our approach to both the development of theory and the application of the resulting principles of population biology to practical problems. The authors recommend an approach in which results from applications are monitored so that they can form an empirical extension of the process of developing theoretical principles. This approach would both foster development of a theory that could be more useful in the solution of practical problems in applied population biology and provide additional empirical support for the theory itself. In the development of a "general, predictive' theory, they recommend 1) closer adherence to the more restrictive definition of the word "general' (ie holds for many specific cases) and 2) an appreciation for the weak implications of correct predictions. -from Authors
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0027041869&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-32911-6_12; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-0-585-32911-6_12; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-0-585-32911-6_12; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-0-585-32911-6_12; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-32911-6_12; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-585-32911-6_12
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know