Concluding remarks
Green Energy and Technology, ISSN: 1865-3537, Vol: 27, Page: 235-251
2011
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Book Chapter Description
In this concluding chapter we firstly discuss interlaboratory studies, which can be used to demonstrate the reproducibility of a measurement technique, or to compare the results of different techniques, and hence to assess the accuracy of the characterisation process. In particular, we discuss the results of a recent relevant interlaboratory study on hydrogen adsorption. We then discuss reference materials, which can be used to characterise and corroborate both sorption instrument performance and experimental methodology, before describing some provisional measurement guidelines, which provide both a guide to best practice in hydrogen sorption measurement and serve as a useful practical summary of the discussion of the experimental considerations in Chap. 6 10.1007/978-0-85729-221-6_6. We conclude by emphasising the importance of future research into hydrogen sorption measurement accuracy, in order to aid our understanding of the interaction of hydrogen with matter and to help reduce the variation in the reported hydrogen sorption properties of new materials, as the search for a solution to the hydrogen storage problem continues. © Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84883149804&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-221-6_7; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-0-85729-221-6_7; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-0-85729-221-6_7; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-0-85729-221-6_7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-221-6_7; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-85729-221-6_7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know