Studying xenograft rejection of bioprosthetic heart valves
Methods in Molecular Biology, ISSN: 1940-6029, Vol: 2110, Page: 227-243
2020
- 5Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Book Chapter Description
Millions of patients with valvular heart disease have benefitted from heart valve replacement since the procedure was first introduced in the 1960s; however, there are still many patients who get early structural valve deterioration (SVD) of their bioprosthetic heart valves (BHV). BHV are porcine, bovine, or equine tissues that have been glutaraldehyde fixed to preserve the tissue and presumably make the tissue immunologically inert. These glutaraldehyde-fixed BHV with anti-calcification treatments last long periods of time in older adults but develop early SVD in younger patients. The consensus at present is that the early SVD in younger patients is due to more “wear and tear” of the valves and higher calcium turnover in younger patients. However, as younger patients likely have a more robust immune system than older adults, there is a new hypothesis that BHV xenografts may undergo xenograft rejection, and this may contribute to the early SVD seen in younger patients. At present, the technology to noninvasively study in vivo whether an implanted BHV in a human patient is undergoing rejection is not available. Thus, a small animal discordant xenotransplant model in young rodents (to match the young patient getting a pig/bovine/equine BHV) was developed to study whether the hypothesis that glutaraldehyde-fixed BHV undergo xenograft rejection had any merit. In this chapter, we describe our model and its merits and the results of our investigations. Our work provides clear evidence of xenograft rejection in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue, and our small animal model offers an opportunity to study this process in detail.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078713507&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0255-3_15; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002912; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-0716-0255-3_15; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0255-3_15; https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007%2F978-1-0716-0255-3_15
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know