Prediction of Folding and Unfolding Rates of Proteins with Simple Models
Methods in Molecular Biology, ISSN: 1940-6029, Vol: 2376, Page: 365-372
2022
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Book Chapter Description
Large differences exist between the experimentally measured folding and unfolding rates in single-domain proteins, which range from seconds to microseconds. Considerable effort has been dedicated to develop methods for the prediction of these rates using a simple set of rules. Much of this work has focused in identifying structural metrics derived from experimentally resolved protein structures that serve as good predictors of folding rates. An alternative to this ad-hoc methodology is the use of phenomenological free energy models, parametrized with empirical parameters. This alternative approach has become very useful to obtain estimates of folding and, importantly, also unfolding rates with only the information of protein size and secondary structure. Here we present the fundamentals of this type of approach and introduce a recent implementation of this predictive method.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120793123&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1716-8_20; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34845620; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-0716-1716-8_20; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1716-8_20; https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-0716-1716-8_20
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know