Purification and Proteomics Analysis of Phloem Tissues from Virus-Infected Plants
Methods in Molecular Biology, ISSN: 1940-6029, Vol: 2400, Page: 125-137
2022
- 2Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures5
- Readers5
Book Chapter Description
The plant phloem vasculature is crucial for plant growth and development, and is essential for the systemic movement (SM) of plant viruses. Recent transcriptomic studies of the phloem during virus infection have shown the importance of this tissue, yet transcript levels do not provide definitive answers how virus–host interactions favour successful viral SM. Proteomic analyses have been used to identify host–virus protein interactions, uncovering a variety of ways by which viruses utilize host cellular machinery for completion of the viral infection cycle. Despite this new evidence through proteomics, very few phloem centric studies during viral infection have been performed. Here, we describe a protocol for the isolation of phloem tissues and proteins and the subsequent label-free quantitation (LFQ), for identification of proteomic alterations caused by viral infection.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121565326&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1835-6_13; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34905197; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-0716-1835-6_13; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1835-6_13; https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-0716-1835-6_13
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know