Computational Anatomy Going Beyond Brain Morphometry
Neuromethods, ISSN: 1940-6045, Vol: 199, Page: 119-132
2023
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Book Chapter Description
In this chapter, we provide a comprehensive historical overview of algorithms for feature extraction of structural magnetic resonance imaging data and the corresponding analytical frameworks. We then focus on the use of T1-weighted images, which still represent the working horse of surface- and voxel-based morphometry to elaborate on the complex relationships between magnetic resonance imaging contrast and underlying brain tissue properties. This critical point is the motivation for embarking on novel structural imaging protocols based on biophysical models, which are sensitive to tissue myelin, iron, and water content. We expand on the concept of voxel-based quantification to demonstrate the added value to existing methods using T1-weighted data—both in terms of robust brain tissue classification and of straightforward neurobiological interpretation of the obtained results. We do not stop short of considering the unresolved issues in voxel-based quantification currently implemented in the data processing and analysis framework of Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM12). We conclude with an outlook to the future developments and perspectives in computational anatomy, particularly the need for integration of the available magnetic resonance imaging contrasts at the level of statistical analysis without hampering the interpretability of our findings.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85159444480&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3230-7_8; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-0716-3230-7_8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3230-7_8; https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-0716-3230-7_8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know