Patient-Specific Microfluidic Cancer Spheroid Cultures for Testing Cancer Therapies
Methods in Molecular Biology, ISSN: 1940-6029, Vol: 2679, Page: 219-231
2023
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
Book Chapter Description
The field of oncology increasingly focuses on strategies to predict effectiveness of a given therapy on a patient-by-patient basis. Such precision or personalized oncology has the potential of significantly extending patient survival time. Patient-derived organoids are seen as the main source of patient tumor tissue that may be used for therapy testing in personalized oncology. The gold standard approach for culturing cancer organoids is in standard multi-well plates coated with Matrigel. Despite their effectiveness, these standard organoid cultures have drawbacks, namely, requirement of a large starting cell population and polydispersity of cancer organoid sizes. The latter drawback makes it challenging to monitor and quantify changes in organoid size in response to therapy. Microfluidic devices with integrated arrays of microwells may be used to both decrease the amount of starting cellular material required to form organoids and to standardize organoid size to make therapy assessment easier. Herein, we describe methodology for making microfluidic device as well as for seeding patient-derived cancer cells, culturing organoids, and testing therapies using these devices.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85161668999&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3271-0_15; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37300619; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-0716-3271-0_15; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3271-0_15; https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-0716-3271-0_15
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know