Assessment of Protein–Protein Docking Models Using Deep Learning
Methods in Molecular Biology, ISSN: 1940-6029, Vol: 2780, Page: 149-162
2024
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Book Chapter Description
Protein–protein interactions are involved in almost all processes in a living cell and determine the biological functions of proteins. To obtain mechanistic understandings of protein–protein interactions, the tertiary structures of protein complexes have been determined by biophysical experimental methods, such as X-ray crystallography and cryogenic electron microscopy. However, as experimental methods are costly in resources, many computational methods have been developed that model protein complex structures. One of the difficulties in computational protein complex modeling (protein docking) is to select the most accurate models among many models that are usually generated by a docking method. This article reviews advances in protein docking model assessment methods, focusing on recent developments that apply deep learning to several network architectures.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85198408158&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3985-6_10; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38987469; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-0716-3985-6_10; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3985-6_10; https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-0716-3985-6_10
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know