MR angiography and high field strength: 3.0 T and higher
Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Principles and Applications, Page: 149-156
2012
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Book Chapter Description
The motivation for performing MR angiography (MRA) at higher magnetic field strength can be appreciated by answering a few simple questions: Would you like to increase your spatial resolution in time-of-flight or contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA, increase your temporal resolution in dynamic MRA applications, decrease your contrast agent dose in CE-MRA, or even use new imaging contrasts for MRA not available at lower field strength? Higher static magnetic field strengths open opportunities in all of these areas.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84954593953&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1686-0_11; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-1686-0_11; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-1-4419-1686-0_11; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-1-4419-1686-0_11; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1686-0_11; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4419-1686-0_11
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know