The ABC's of CBCA: Verbal credibility assessment in practice
Applied Issues in Investigative Interviewing, Eyewitness Memory, and Credibility Assessment, Page: 293-323
2014
- 7Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Statement validity analysis (SVA) was developed during the 1960s and 1970s in the context of evaluating child witness statements of sexual abuse (e.g., Undeutsch, 1967, 1989). Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) is one component of SVA used to distinguish between event-based and intentionally fabricated statements of child and adult witnesses concerning sexual interactions and other topics (Vrij, 2005). It has become a widely accepted method of credibility assessment in many European courts (see Köhnken, 2004). The last author of the present chapter (JY) was instrumental in bringing this procedure to North America in the late 1980s (e.g., Yuille, 1988) and research conducted by him and other coauthors (DG, MT, BC) is presented in this chapter. Two of the authors (DG, DS) serve as expert witnesses who provide testimony on statement credibility in German courts. This chapter, thus, offers insights from both researchers' and practitioners' points of view, as well as from European and North-American perspectives.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84929524163&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5547-9_12; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-5547-9_12; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5547-9_12; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-5547-9_12
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know