RTks in invertebrates: Lessons in signal transduction
Receptor Tyrosine Kinases: Structure, Functions and Role in Human Disease, Page: 37-49
2015
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Book Chapter Description
Receptor tyrosine kinases were first isolated from the Drosophila genome in 1985 (Livneh et al. Cell 40(3):599-607, 1985; Wadsworth et al. Nature 314(6007):178-80, 1985), shortly after the isolation of the vertebrate receptors. Following the initial structural studies of these receptors, additional components in their signaling pathways were identified. Genetic epistasis studies have aided further in determining the linear order of signaling components within the pathway. Importantly, in genetically tractable organisms like Drosophila and C. elegans, the different roles of each receptor during development were deciphered. This chapter focuses on the insights obtained by studying RTKs in invertebrate organisms. One important observation is that RTK pathways guiding developmental decisions appear to be linear, rather than branched. A second observation is that there is no temporal overlap between distinct RTK pathways within the same cells. Since the activation of MAPK represents a common node to all RTK cascades, it was possible to examine this notion directly. Antibodies that specifically recognize the active, double phosphorylated form of MAPK allow to trace immunohistochemically the dynamic pattern of activation by all RTKs (Gabay et al. Development 124(18):3535-41, 1997). Each aspect of this pattern could be completely removed in a genetic background that specifically eliminates signaling by only one RTK pathway. This implies that the activation of MAPK per se does not provide information on the identity of the activated receptor, and it is the time and tissue context of MAPK activation that defines the target genes that will be induced. The time and place of the activation of each RTK pathway are tightly regulated by the expression of the respective ligands or ligand-processing components. The range of activation is defined by the level of ligand that is secreted and by negative feedback circuits that restrict the range of pathway stimulation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84944604557&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2053-2_3; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4939-2053-2_3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2053-2_3; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4939-2053-2_3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know