Creating heritable mutations in drosophila with CRISPR-cas9
Methods in Molecular Biology, ISSN: 1064-3745, Vol: 1478, Page: 145-160
2016
- 24Citations
- 59Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations24
- Citation Indexes24
- 24
- CrossRef7
- Captures59
- Readers59
- 59
Book Chapter Description
Reverse genetics—the creation of mutations in preselected target genes—has until recently been a bottleneck in many Drosophila projects. The advent of clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) genome engineering systems has transformed this situation. A short time after the in vitro demonstration of target site cleavage by the RNA-guided endonuclease CRISPR-associated nuclease 9 (Cas9) (Jinek et al., Science 337:816–821, 2012), hundreds of fl y researchers are using CRISPR technology to generate loss-of-function mutant alleles in specific genes, as well as to create specific point mutations or tagged protein products. It appears that most target genes can be edited with remarkably high efficiency, with engineered strains often available a few weeks after conception of a project. Here, we provide a step-by-step protocol for creating loss-of-function mutations in Drosophila using transgenic Cas9 sources, which is based on optimized reagents and procedures that have been evaluated in our laboratory. We also provide guidance on extending this protocol to produce precise genomic alterations by homologydirected repair in the presence of a donor sequence. Additional information and updates are available from our website, www.crisprfl ydesign.org.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84991447235&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_7; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27730579; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_7; https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-1-4939-6371-3_7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_7; https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know