Detection and phylogenetic assessment of conserved synteny derived from whole genome duplications
Methods in Molecular Biology, ISSN: 1064-3745, Vol: 855, Page: 385-395
2012
- 18Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef17
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Book Chapter Description
Identification of intragenomic conservation of gene compositions in multiple chromosomal segments led to evidence of whole genome (WGDs) duplications. The process by which WGDs have been maintained and decayed provides us with clues for understanding how the genome evolves. In this chapter, we summarize current understanding of phylogenetic distribution and evolutionary impact of WGDs, introduce basic procedures to detect conserved synteny, and discuss typical pitfalls, as well as biological insights. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84859945485&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-582-4_14; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22407717; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-61779-582-4_14; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-582-4_14; https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-61779-582-4_14
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know