Multi-modal motion planning for precision pushing on a humanoid robot
Motion Planning for Humanoid Robots, Page: 251-276
2010
- 2Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
This chapter presents a motion planner that enables a humanoid robot to push an object to a desired location on a cluttered table. To reduce reliance on visual feedback, we restrict the robot to use a class of stable pushes that move the object predictably, such that a plan can be executed precisely with infrequent sensing. The motion of the robot-object system lies in a space with a multi-modal structure, where the motion switches between walking, reaching, and pushing modes. Each mode imposes mode-specific constraints (e.g., dynamic constraints, kinematic limits, obstacle avoidance) such that motion is restricted to a lower dimensional sub-space. The multi-modal planner must choose a discrete sequence of mode switches to reach the goal, while performing continuous motion planning to move between them. To address the problem of selecting modes, we present the Random-MMP algorithm, which randomly samples mode transitions to distribute a sparse number of modes across configuration space. The resulting planner solves problems that require several carefully chosen pushes in minutes. Results are presented in simulation and on the Honda ASIMO robot. © 2010 Springer-Verlag London.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84892359835&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-220-9_9; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-84996-220-9_9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-220-9_9; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-84996-220-9_9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-1-84996-220-9_9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-1-84996-220-9_9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know