Techniques for efficient lazy-grounding ASP solving
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 10997 LNAI, Page: 132-148
2018
- 7Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Answer-Set Programming (ASP) is a well-known and expressive logic programming paradigm based on efficient solvers. State-of-the-art ASP solvers require the ASP program to be variable-free, they thus ground the program upfront at the cost of a potential exponential explosion of the space required. Lazy-grounding, where solving and grounding are interleaved, circumvents this grounding bottleneck, but the resulting solvers lack many important search techniques and optimizations. The recently introduced ASP solver Alpha combines lazy-grounding with conflict-driven nogood learning (CDNL), a core technique of efficient ASP solving. This work presents how techniques for efficient propagation can be lifted to the lazy-grounding setting. The Alpha solver and its components are presented and detailed benchmarks comparing Alpha to other ASP solvers demonstrate the feasibility of this approach.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85054814478&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00801-7_9; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-00801-7_9; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-00801-7_9; https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-030-00801-7_9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00801-7_9; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-00801-7_9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know