cGAAM – An algorithm for simultaneous feature selection and clustering
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, ISSN: 2194-5365, Vol: 977, Page: 153-163
2020
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
Book Chapter Description
In this paper the modified version of cGAAM (a genetic algorithm for feature selection for clustering) is introduced. As it can be shown, the algorithm is able to find significant subsets of features in data sets that differ in size and number of classes. The common feature of the sets that were used to test the cGAAM is that the examples are provided with class labels. Due to this, although the clustering process was performed without the class labels, the chosen feature sets could be compared with feature subsets returned by Lasso method in terms of classification accuracy. The most important observation from the results presented in the paper is that the classification accuracy obtained with feature subsets returned by cGAAM was not only comparable with accuracy obtained with feature subsets returned by Lasso but almost always was higher than 80% (ionsphere dataset) and 90% (humanactivity dataset).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85065839351&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19738-4_16; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-19738-4_16; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19738-4_16; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-19738-4_16
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know