3D Imaging in Dentistry and Oral Tissue Engineering
Applications of Biomedical Engineering in Dentistry, Page: 43-87
2019
- 1Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Tissue engineering employs several equipment and technologies to achieve its goals. Three-dimensional (3D) imaging is one of those techniques that can assist in planning, monitoring, and follow-up of the results in morphological and functional aspects without damaging the tissue-engineered constructs. Each imaging system has its own capabilities and features. Thus, to extract the maximum information required, the best imaging modality must be chosen according to the diagnostic purpose. One of preponderant specifications of “imaging” in evaluation of engineered tissues, besides nondestructive nature, is the possibility of longitudinal assessments. This chapter reviews the 3D imaging systems that may have applications in dentistry and oral tissue engineering including computed tomography (CT), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), micro-CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The physics and the applications of each method in dentistry and tissue engineering, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of them, are discussed. Instead of setting rigid guidelines for specific applications, the authors aim to familiarize the readers with the mechanism of function of each system, so they can select the systems that best suit their intended applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85149079287&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21583-5_4; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-21583-5_4; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-21583-5_4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21583-5_4; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-21583-5_4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know