Inconsistency Handling for Partially Preordered Ontologies: Going Beyond Elect
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 11775 LNAI, Page: 15-23
2019
- 2Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
We continue investigations into computing repairs for an inconsistent Description Logic (DL) knowledge base (KB). In recent work, a tractable method, called Elect, has been introduced to restore consistency of the ABox w.r.t. the TBox. Elect deals with the case of KBs expressed in DL-Lite and when a partial preorder is applied to the ABox. It has been shown that Elect generalizes the well-known IAR semantics when no priority relation over the ABox is used, and the so-called non-defeated semantics when the relation is a total preorder. In the present paper, we propose two extensions of Elect. First, we redefine Elect by using a preference-based semantics from the literature but with the drawback of losing tractability. Second, we show under which conditions Elect can be generalized to DLs that are more expressive than DL-Lite.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85081583492&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29551-6_2; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-29551-6_2; https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-030-29551-6_2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29551-6_2; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-29551-6_2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know