Emergence of geovigilantes and geographic information ethics in the web 2.0 Era
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0937, Vol: 1061, Page: 55-72
2019
- 1Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The current technical evolution has enabled GIS as a tool for social participation, empowerment, and public involvement. Public citizens become acclimatized to voluntarily participate in regional policy planning, local governance and crisis mapping. However, it also brings the consequences that people can casually participate in mapping behaviour without being aware of their position of power in creating geographic information without knowledge of cartography or ethics. Thus, the premise that such net-rooted and undisciplined people do what experts expect of them no longer applies. In this paper, based on the literature on online activism and digital vigilantism, the author introduces the notion of geovigilantism and highlights the necessity of developing geographic information ethics for PGIS in the Web 2.0 era by referring to two types of recent online cyberbullying incidents. Because technology-aided ubiquitous mapping is difficult to see or grasp, especially for those not educated and trained to see it, these advances prompt people to lower technical and ethical barriers. Further studies are essential to establish geographic information ethics and address this newly emerging problem.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85071935601&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29948-4_3; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-29948-4_3; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-29948-4_3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29948-4_3; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-29948-4_3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know