Emerging market multinationals and their cross-border acquisitions: Global and regional challenges
Emerging Market Multinationals and Europe: Challenges and Strategies, Page: 103-122
2019
- 4Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
The aim of this chapter is to take stock of what we know about cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As) by emerging market firms with a special focus on their M&A activity in economically advanced markets. A recent upsurge in cross-border acquisitions has attracted much media attention as acquisitions have not only been emerging market firms’ preferred mode of global expansion but are also currently considered a tool for achieving global and regional dominance. Research on this phenomenon is still in its infant stages and is comprised of inconsistent and sometimes contradictory explanations and findings. Moreover, emerging market multinationals expanding into economically advanced markets are confronted with numerous obstacles, with their country of origin, local resistance, and general suspicion becoming liabilities. Yet most research has taken the point of view of the recipients of emerging market multinationals’ investments with little concern about emerging market multinationals’ challenges. This literature review is aimed at summarizing past research on emerging market multinationals’ cross-border M&As and, along with that, zooming in on the challenges encountered as a way of potentially improving emerging market multinationals’ image among global investors and increasing their chances of successful international expansion via cross-border M&As. We advocate the application of signaling theory as a theoretical tool to gain a more detailed understanding of emerging market multinationals’ investment behavior.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85083662576&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31291-6_7; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-31291-6_7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31291-6_7; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-31291-6_7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know