Data sharing and privacy–preserving of medical records using blockchain
Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, ISSN: 2367-4520, Vol: 39, Page: 65-72
2020
- 2Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
The present way to deal with patient health records disappoints clinicians and fails to fulfill the requirements of a diverse patient population. Many of these issues are raised due to absentiseem of direct control by doctors and patients over the innovation that serves them. As these innovations empower secure credentialing of authorized professionals and audit of clinical exchanges without the cooperation of a doctor’s facility or state middle person, we have actualized health data innovation that is bought and controlled by the people in the clinical relationship. A Blockchain is an open Distributed Ledger that can record transactions between two parties efficiently, verifiable and permanent way. This empowers every patient and each authorized specialist to claim and totally control their open source associated health records inside a protected situation. The aim is to study concepts and techniques of blockchain and to understand how blockchain technology works for different applications in different scenarios. Our arrangement is a patient-focused way to deal with privacy assurance in cloud computing and data dependent on advanced assent models, blockchain identity, and blockchain audit. Digitally signed and encrypted transactions are verified by the peers. Public blockchains, for example, Bitcoin and Ethereum have been appeared to expel institutional control and decentralize innovation with advantages to development and restriction opposition.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85083456133&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34515-0_8; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-34515-0_8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34515-0_8; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-34515-0_8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know