Model-Driven Software Development Combined with Semantic Mutation of UML State Machines
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0937, Vol: 1172 CCIS, Page: 204-226
2020
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Conference Paper Description
The paper presents an approach to semantic mutation of state machines that specify class behavior in Model-Driven Software Development. The mutations are aimed at different variants of UML state machine behavior. Mutation testing of a target application allows to compare different semantic interpretations and verify a set of test cases. We present a notation of a process combining model-driven development with semantic mutation and semantic consequence-oriented mutations. Origin and details of the proposed mutation operators are discussed. The approach has been supported by the Framework for eXecutable UML (FXU) that creates a C# application from UML classes and state machines. The tool architecture has been reengineered in order to apply semantic mutation operators into the model-driven development process and realize testing on a set of semantic mutants. The tool and the implemented mutation operators have been verified in a case study on a status service for a social network.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85080906771&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40223-5_10; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-40223-5_10; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-40223-5_10; https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-030-40223-5_10; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40223-5_10; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-40223-5_10
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know