Managing the Galapagos National Park: A Systemic Approach Based on Socio-ecological Modeling and Sustainability Indicators
Socio-ecological Studies in Natural Protected Areas: Linking Community Development and Conservation in Mexico, Page: 187-214
2020
- 3Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
The assessment of the sustainability should be tackled with a systemic perspective that enables an integrated analysis of the environmental, social, economic, and institutional factors and their interactions characterizing protected areas, as well as other complex socio-ecological systems. An integrated framework for such assessment is presented with the following key components: (i) the hierarchical definition of sustainability goals and indicators; (ii) a dynamic system model taking into account the key socioeconomic and environmental factors and their interactions, in which the most representative indicators and their sustainability thresholds are integrated; (iii) the analysis of vulnerabilities to exogenous drivers (scenario analysis) and the exploration of available management and planning options (policy assessment); (iv) a multicriteria procedure, in which indicators, sustainability thresholds, model outputs, and scenario and policy analysis are integrated to guide decisions for an improved sustainability in complex socio-ecological system. The whole framework integrates a participative approach, mainly for the initial and final steps. In this chapter, some of these components, specifically indicators, dynamic model, and scenario analysis, are applied to one of the most valuable and challenging protected sites in the world: the Galapagos Islands (Ecuador).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098074397&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47264-1_11; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-47264-1_11; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47264-1_11; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-47264-1_11
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know