Theoretical overview of disaster stressors and responses: Relational and clinical implications
The Intersection of Trauma and Disaster Behavioral Health, Page: 65-83
2020
- 3Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Intentional use of theory to guide family-focused disaster research has many benefits that will help to advance the field. Theory-driven inquiry allows researchers to advance programs of scholarship that are less reactive to specific disaster events and more nuanced in developing our understanding of how families are affected and respond to disasters. Scholars studying families in the wake of disaster have utilized a variety of theories to formulate questions and to guide data analyses. This chapter first outlines the need for family-focused scholarship in the area of disaster studies and emphasizes the need for continued theory-driven research programs pertaining to natural disaster and the family. The next section of this chapter presents the tenets and prior use of four prominent theoretical lenses used by disaster scholars in the past two decades including the conservation of resources theory, ecological theory, attachment theory, and the family stress theory. Research and clinical implications of utilizing each theory are discussed, as well as suggestions for the development of programmatic research questions connected with each theory. Directions for future research with families building upon established theories and cross-disciplinary perspectives are considered.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128101994&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51525-6_5; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-51525-6_5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51525-6_5; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-51525-6_5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know